My revising process for this particular essay was a lot different than that of essays I wrote in high school. The main difference being I did not fall in love with my first draft and instead I scrapped large portions of it, added chunks and moved parts around to make the overall structure make more sense. I would count this step as evaluating as I made changes to my essay so that it better met the standards of the assignment.I also used the constructive criticism I received from my classmates to improve my paper which is something I am not used to as the typical comments I would receive on my papers would be all positive leaving me no room or ideas on how to improve my paper.To me this step is analyzing as I viewed my paper in parts highlighted by my peers and I then changed and made corrections piece by piece until my paper made more sense and flowed better. I believe this was the most helpful tool during the revision process as it helped me narrow down things I really needed to improve on and the things that I got right. Overall I am satisfied with my final draft. I think it is structured coherently, addresses the prompt, ties Dweck, bain and my experiences together and provides a thoughtful analysis on who I am as a learner and it gave me the foundation I needed to make a podcast about myself as a learner, I would consider this step to be creating.